Do not ask anything from us anymore… Hezbollah rejects disarmament north of the Litani
Lebanon’s Hezbollah moved ahead of the government’s plans to move to the second phase of the decision to make weapons exclusive to the state, implicitly rejecting disarmament north of the Litani River.
The party’s deputy secretary-general, Naim Qassem, reaffirmed Hezbollah’s position that the ceasefire agreement with Israel stipulates disarmament only south of the Litani, saying: “Do not ask anything from us anymore.”
-
Austria dismantles Hezbollah’s propaganda strategy: its activities in Europe exposed
-
Lebanon in 2025: the State Advances and Hezbollah Loses Its Leverage
While Hezbollah says that the ceasefire provisions related to disarmament do not apply north of the Litani, the government insists that its plan to confine weapons to the state covers the entire national territory.
Qassem’s stance came days after Prime Minister Najib Mikati affirmed the government’s readiness to implement the plan to restrict weapons north of the Litani.
The Lebanese prime minister said last week: “The first phase of the weapons-control plan, related to the south of the Litani River, is only days away from completion, and the state is ready to move to the second phase — namely, north of the Litani — based on the plan prepared by the Lebanese Army at the government’s request.”
-
Hezbollah disarmament: Paris meeting to discuss practical means of monitoring
-
Israel strikes Hezbollah positions in Lebanon
In August, the Council of Ministers approved limiting weapons to the state and asked the Lebanese Army to draft an implementation plan to be completed before the end of the year — a decision rejected by Hezbollah.
In September, the government formally adopted the plan presented by the army command to strip the party of its weapons.
On December 19, the French capital hosted a meeting attended by Lebanese Army commander Rudolf Heikal to discuss “practical means” to verify Hezbollah’s disarmament.
-
Israel prepares for a new confrontation with Hezbollah, pending Trump’s approval
-
After the war with Israel, has Hezbollah rebuilt its military arsenal?
In a speech delivered on Sunday, Qassem ignored the government’s decision and again referred to the agreement with Israel, saying: “The agreement (with Israel) is meant for the south of the Litani River. Five times it mentions the south of the Litani River. I am surprised by those who do not see what is required of Israel and instead try to interpret the agreement by adding more demands on Hezbollah and on Lebanon.”
He added: “Our position is this: what the Lebanese Army has achieved in terms of deployment south of the Litani River in the past period was supposed to happen only if Israel complied. Even so, we facilitated it, and the army deployed. Volunteering further measures — whether by the Lebanese state or others — is an irresponsible concession, indeed a dangerous one, that threatens major national interests. Do not ask anything from us anymore.”
-
Iranian insistence on sponsoring Hezbollah tests the limits of Lebanese sovereignty
-
What Awaits Lebanon if Washington’s Deadline for Hezbollah’s Disarmament Expires?
-
Israel raises its threat level against Hezbollah to force its disarmament
-
Thirty years of pursuing him inside Hezbollah… How did Israel reach al-Tabtabai?
-
One year after the end of the war… 669 Israeli strikes in Lebanon and 360 Hezbollah fighters killed
-
Winter fog hides what is most dangerous: Israeli drill amid Hezbollah retaliation fears
-
Washington bets on drying up Hezbollah’s funding sources to force it to lay down its arms
-
From drones to smart munitions: how is Hezbollah rearming itself?
-
Hezbollah responds to the November deadline and signals its commitment to keeping its weapons









