---

Starbucks, one of the world’s largest coffeehouse chains, is once again under legal scrutiny as two customers have filed lawsuits alleging severe burns caused by hot beverages that spilled on them. These lawsuits come just two weeks after the American coffee giant was ordered to pay $50 million in damages in a similar case, raising questions about the company’s safety protocols and handling of hot drinks.

• “Unexpected” risks of energy drinks for heart patients

• 5 Common Summer Health Issues and How to Prevent Them

New Lawsuits Filed Against Starbucks

In one of the latest cases, plaintiff Sabrina Michelle Hermes claims she suffered significant injuries when a hot beverage spilled on her at a Starbucks drive-thru in Norwalk, California, near Los Angeles. The incident, which allegedly occurred two years ago, resulted in burns on her legs, hip, knee, and feet.

According to Hermes, the Starbucks employee failed to properly secure one of the cups in the provided drink holder, leading to the spill. Her lawsuit contends that Starbucks had a duty of care to ensure that hot beverages are safely prepared and served in a manner that prevents such incidents.

• Thousands of Coca-Cola Cans Recalled in the U.S. Details

• Bariatric Tea: An Innovative Natural Recipe for Obesity Treatment

Hermes is seeking unspecified damages for the injuries she sustained, arguing that the company’s negligence directly led to her suffering. The legal complaint emphasizes that Starbucks employees should be adequately trained to handle and serve hot beverages with caution to minimize the risk of harm to customers.

In response to the lawsuit, a Starbucks spokesperson told Agence France-Presse (AFP): “We are aware of Hermes’ claims, and we firmly believe they are untrue. We look forward to presenting our version of events in court.” The spokesperson also reaffirmed Starbucks’ commitment to maintaining the highest safety standards in its stores, including its handling procedures for hot beverages.

• Simple Steps to Quit Caffeine without Headaches

• Study: Espresso Delays Facial Aging and Skin Wrinkles

A Second Lawsuit Emerges in Alhambra, California

In a separate incident, another California resident, Ernesto Sanchez Avendaño, has also taken legal action against Starbucks, accusing the company of negligence. Avendaño alleges that he sustained severe burns after receiving a drink with an improperly sealed lid, which caused the hot beverage to spill on his knees.

The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday, asserts that Starbucks’ failure to securely place the lid on the drink directly resulted in his injuries. Like Hermes, Avendaño is seeking unspecified damages, citing the company’s lack of diligence in preventing such incidents.

A Starbucks spokesperson stated that the company had not yet been notified of Avendaño’s lawsuit but assured that it would “review it carefully.” The company’s response will likely determine whether it faces additional legal battles over its handling of hot drinks.

• Reasons to reduce their consumption

• Sad snacks – Negative emotions make children eat junk food

Recurring Legal Issues: The $50 Million Lawsuit

These two new lawsuits come in the wake of a high-profile legal decision in which Starbucks was ordered to pay $50 million in damages to a California customer, Michael Garcia, who suffered third-degree burns from a hot tea spill.

Garcia’s case, which was resolved just two weeks prior, stemmed from an incident where a Starbucks employee failed to securely place a cup of hot tea in his cup holder while he was collecting his order from his car. The drink spilled on his knees, causing third-degree burns on his genitals and thighs.

• After New Year’s Tragic Incidents, Germany Considers Fireworks Ban

• Mexico: 17 Dead in Separate Violent Incidents

Garcia’s attorneys successfully argued that the negligence of Starbucks staff resulted in his injuries, and the court ruled in his favor, awarding the substantial financial settlement. Starbucks, however, announced its intention to appeal the ruling, calling the $50 million damages award “excessive.”

A Pattern of Legal Disputes Over Hot Beverages

The current lawsuits against Starbucks have reignited discussions about the safety of handling and serving hot beverages in fast-food and coffee chains. This latest controversy echoes a historic legal battle from 1994 involving McDonald’s.

• Incident in Argentina: One Casualty and Several Missing After Hotel Collapse

• Gas Incident in Southern China Results in 7 Fatalities

In that case, 79-year-old Stella Liebeck suffered third-degree burns on her thighs after accidentally spilling a McDonald’s coffee on herself. The lawsuit, filed in New Mexico, resulted in a jury awarding Liebeck over $2.8 million in damages. The case became one of the most well-known examples of consumer lawsuits against major food and beverage companies.

Despite the decades that have passed since the Liebeck case, incidents of customers suffering burns from hot beverages continue to make headlines, prompting concerns about whether coffee chains have taken sufficient steps to mitigate these risks.

• New Disappearance Incident: Child “Angry at His Mother” Goes Missing in Turkey

• Incident Surrounded by Mystery: Search for Missing British Teen in Spain Halted

Safety Measures and Industry-Wide Implications

While Starbucks maintains that it adheres to rigorous safety standards in the preparation and service of its beverages, the recurrence of such lawsuits suggests that there may be room for improvement in employee training and operational protocols.

Industry experts argue that businesses serving hot beverages should take extra precautions, including:

• Ensuring cup lids are securely fastened before handing drinks to customers.
• Providing reinforced cup holders that reduce the likelihood of spills.
• Training employees on best practices for handling and serving hot drinks.
• Offering protective sleeves for all hot beverages to minimize heat exposure.

If the lawsuits against Starbucks gain traction in court, the company may be pressured to implement additional safeguards to prevent future incidents. Additionally, other coffee chains and fast-food establishments might also face increased scrutiny regarding their handling of hot drinks.

• 5 injured, including 3 children, in a stabbing incident in Dublin

• Fire at Power Station Paralyzes Heathrow Airport, Cancels Over 1,000 Flights

Potential Legal and Financial Consequences for Starbucks

Given the ongoing legal battles, Starbucks could face significant financial liabilities if courts rule in favor of the plaintiffs. Beyond monetary settlements, the company risks damage to its reputation, particularly if customers perceive it as neglecting safety concerns.

Legal experts suggest that an accumulation of lawsuits may compel Starbucks to reassess its current practices and introduce more stringent safety measures to avoid further litigation. The outcome of these cases will likely influence future legal standards in the food and beverage industry regarding customer safety and liability.

• By Mistake, an American Bank Deposits $81 Trillion into a Customer’s Account

• 13 Coins Extracted from a Child’s Stomach in Egypt

Looking Ahead: What’s Next for Starbucks?

As the lawsuits proceed, Starbucks will have to navigate a complex legal landscape while maintaining its brand image and customer trust. The coffee giant will need to balance its defense in court with public relations efforts to reassure customers that their safety remains a top priority.

With an increasing number of cases related to hot beverage burns, this issue is unlikely to disappear anytime soon. Whether Starbucks can successfully defend itself or will be required to pay further damages remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the company is under intense scrutiny, and the outcome of these legal battles could have lasting implications for the entire industry.

For now, customers and legal analysts alike will be closely watching how Starbucks responds to these claims and whether any significant policy changes will follow to prevent similar incidents in the future.

• Massive Wildfires: A Worrisome Mystery for Scientists

• 27 Dead and Thousands Displaced: California Residents Struggle to Find Housing After Wildfires