Policy

Humanitarian Crossings in Sudan: A Relief Map Shackled by the Army’s Political Pressure


A year has passed since the Sudanese army announced a roadmap for humanitarian aid routes to reach those affected by the war.

Yet, despite the passing months, civilians have seen virtually no benefit from this aid. Many Sudanese, worn out by waiting and repeated promises, say the results remain at a glaring “zero.”

In March of last year, Sudan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued an official statement outlining approved entry points for humanitarian aid from neighboring countries, confirming that army leadership had endorsed the map.

However, those declarations quickly faded, and the humanitarian impact of the war continued to cast a heavy shadow, exposing a wide gap between statements and actions.

الأزمة في السودان: مذكرة إحاطة حول النزوح من السودان إلى جنوب السودان - منصة العلوم الاجتماعية في العمل الإنساني

The ministry stated that it had informed the UN of Port Sudan’s agreement to use the “Tine” crossing—linking Chad with El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur—for aid delivery. This was coordinated with the Chadian government, based on UN Security Council Resolution 1591.

The ministry also noted that this approval came despite concerns that the Chad border had become a key supply route for the Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

New Developments

On Monday, the Sudanese Sovereign Council announced that its head and army commander, General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, had received a call from UN Assistant Secretary-General Tom Fletcher, during which humanitarian conditions and aid access to El Fasher were discussed.

Following that, the statement said Sudan’s government had approved the UN’s request to establish logistical bases near El Fasher to support relief efforts in Mellit and Tawila in North Darfur.

However, the situation on the ground, as documented by the General Coordination of Displaced Persons and Refugee Camps in Sudan, tells a different story.

From El Fasher to Tawila, suffering continues in full view of the army and its allies, in what seems a deliberate attempt to mislead international officials with false promises contradicted by reality.

From the Field

Adam Rajal painted a grim picture, reporting continued displacement from Zamzam and Abu Shouk camps toward Tawila, now sheltering over 1.5 million people.

He noted that displacement has spread beyond Tawila to Jebel Marra, Fanga, Deribat, Rokero, Golo, Nertiti, and other areas in Darfur.

Rajal warned that the humanitarian situation is critical, with rising daily deaths due to hunger, thirst, and disease.

Displaced people live in camps resembling detention centers, lacking basic services amid widespread infrastructure collapse. Military forces continue to detain activists and restrict movement, especially in Abu Shouk north of El Fasher.

Map of Crossings

Dr. Salah El-Amin, an international humanitarian expert, said border crossings in Sudan are divided based on military control: the Sudanese army and its allies, the RSF, SPLM-N led by Abdelaziz al-Hilu, and Abdul Wahid al-Nur’s movement.

He explained that the army controls Argeen and Ashkeit in the north (Egypt border), the river port of Renk (South Sudan border), Red Sea port, Port Sudan airport, and Kassala airport in the east.

The army’s allies control the Tine crossing on the Chad border, while the RSF controls Adré (also on the Chad border), Aweil in Northern Bahr el Ghazal, and another crossing with South Sudan held by al-Hilu’s forces.

The army has rejected opening Adré, citing its use for military supplies to the RSF, and insists on using the Tine crossing in North Darfur.

WFP regional emergency coordinator in Sudan, Betty Ka, previously warned that “time is running out” amid intense fighting in El Fasher, Khartoum, and other hotspots.

She stressed that the army resists opening Adré, despite knowing that Tine becomes impassable during the rainy season, hindering humanitarian convoys.

Minimal Impact

El-Amin emphasized that delivering aid in Sudan is complicated by the entanglement of security, politics, and humanitarian issues.

He called for a unified relief effort with high-level coordination and international oversight.

He recommended leveraging local community networks, emergency kitchens, and grassroots initiatives, with controlling authorities limited to issuing movement permits.

He described the current aid reach as “very weak,” with only 6% coverage so far, due to international organizations’ reluctance to operate in risky environments.

Delays and Obstruction

Political analyst and civil society expert Kambal Abdelwahid said that humanitarian workers’ failure to obtain permits stems from the army’s strategy of “delaying and stalling,” claiming aid shipments might hide weapons.

He said many organizations have repeatedly reported severe difficulties and bureaucratic barriers that have significantly worsened the crisis.

These groups have called for opening and securing humanitarian crossings, ensuring safe corridors, and increasing international support to meet growing needs—calls that have largely been ignored by the de facto authorities in Port Sudan.

Since mid-April 2023, the Sudanese army and the RSF have been at war, resulting in thousands of deaths and millions of displacements. International voices are growing louder, urging an end to the conflict and calling for urgent aid, as famine and death spread due to closed relief corridors

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button
Verified by MonsterInsights