Policy

A Peace Prescription for the Middle East: Will Europe Step Out of the Shadows?


Despite its multifaceted presence in the region, the European Union has rarely played more than a supporting role in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Over the past two decades, many European governments have come to see the two-state solution as nearly impossible, no longer worth the effort. This has led many in Europe to tacitly support Israel’s status quo while occasionally condemning its actions, according to Foreign Affairs.

But Europe can no longer afford to remain on the sidelines of a conflict that reignited with Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack and escalated with Israel’s devastating war in Gaza and rising tensions with Iran. The continent’s security is now at stake, the magazine argues.

The EU has unique insights to offer: hard-earned lessons from the 20th century on rejecting endless cycles of war and making peace with former enemies.

While some European leaders have called for a more active role, the EU needs a coherent strategy. A set of principles—drawn from five years of attempting to coordinate fragmented Middle East policies—can help guide these efforts.

Excessive caution

Many in Europe felt that President Donald Trump was unwilling or unable to act as an effective mediator. Regardless of U.S. intentions, Europeans have a distinctive role to play. They’ve seen firsthand that, despite political demonization, most people wish to live in peace with their neighbors—though specific conditions can allow extremists to dominate.

Since October 7, the EU has relied on its traditional tools—economic aid and normative statements—but with caution and inconsistency. It significantly increased its aid to Gaza, pledging around $125 million for 2024 via UNRWA and the Red Crescent. Yet this support came with no strong guarantees of impact.

It also repeatedly called for a ceasefire and respect for international law, issuing statements condemning both Hamas attacks and Israel’s disproportionate responses.

Internal divisions

However, internal rifts have weakened the EU’s impact. While some leaders cautiously support the ICC’s investigations, others—like Austria and Germany—refuse to enforce arrest warrants targeting Israeli officials.

Because member states failed to agree on revisiting the EU’s trade policy with Israel, the bloc remains its largest trade partner. As a result, the EU has been marginalized and sidelined in ceasefire diplomacy led by the U.S. and regional players.

Untapped potential

Foreign Affairs argues that the EU’s decades-long experience in conflict resolution—based on mutual recognition and non-domination—gives it unique relevance. It also holds practical tools to shape peace efforts in the Middle East.

Europe wields enormous influence but has not leveraged it effectively. While its restraint may stem from its colonial legacy, it must act to protect its values and vital interests.

What should Europe do?

Foreign Affairs outlines a peace roadmap:

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button
Verified by MonsterInsights